Institutional rental housing vs. coliving: what are the pros and cons of these models?

  • 25.7.2025
  • Matěj Beránek, Jakub Salát

In recent years, two specific models have increasingly appeared on the housing market – institutional rental housing a coliving. Both approaches offer alternatives to traditional owner-occupied housing, yet they differ fundamentally in their nature, target group and use of space.

Institutional rental housing: stability and long-term facilities

This concept is characterised by entire development projects being built for rent and managed by professional investors or funds. In contrast to individuals renting out their flat, there is a centralised management that ensures a uniform quality of service.

These projects are usually built in cities where there is a high demand for housing and offer stability, transparency and often a higher standard. Tenants can count on long-term contracts, quality service and sometimes bonuses such as common areas or community activities.

Who is this model suitable for? For families, young couples or individuals looking for long-term housing without the commitment of ownership, but at the same time they want to enjoy the comfort of their own home. On the Czech market, such a model has started to appear mainly in recent years, largely due to the increasing unaffordability of housing. An example is the Fragment apartment building in Prague’s Karlín district.

Coliving: flexibility and shared experiences

On the one hand, Coliving attracts the younger generation, such as digital nomads, students or recent graduates. On the other hand, coliving spaces for the elderly are springing up around the world. Compared to institutional rental housing, coliving is based on shared space and the common values of its inhabitants. Residents have private rooms (often just bedrooms with bathrooms), while kitchens, living rooms, coworking spaces or gyms are shared with other tenants.

Coliving projects often originate in large cities and aim to maximum flexibility and low costs. Operators focus on the community aspect, where shared spaces encourage social interaction between residents. However, this type of housing can mean a lower degree of privacy and is usually suitable for short or medium-term stays. On the other hand, in the case of seniors, this housing model can be particularly suitable for improving mental health through daily interaction, promoting an active lifestyle and better financial conditions, where shared facilities such as kitchens or common rooms can help people on a limited budget.

Foto: Unsplasch, Priscilla du Preez

Key differences between coliving and rental housing

The fundamental difference between institutional rental housing and coliving lies in several areas:

Objective: While institutional housing targets stability and long-term rentals, coliving focuses on flexibility and shared environments.

Target group: Institutional rental housing appeals to a broad spectrum of tenants (families, individuals), coliving attracts both young, dynamic residents looking for community life and seniors who may find in coliving an opportunity to combat their isolation.

Space: In institutional housing, each tenant has a fully equipped apartment. In coliving, the main focus is on shared facilities, which can save money on rent.

InvestmentsA: In terms of investment, rental housing and coliving attracts especially larger investors who want a stable return with lower risk compared to other forms of investment. For example, pension funds often invest in these projects and have the project built by the developer. The efficiency of the investment is then approximately 10% higher for long-term rental housing compared to coliving, due to the longevity of the lease contracts and higher rents.

Housing of the future?

Both concepts respond to the current needs of the market, where the demand for alternative forms of housing is growing. While institutional rental housing offers a stable basis for long-term planning, coliving is an attractive option for those who prefer flexibility, community living and lower costs.

With the rising cost of housing and changes in demographic trends, coliving is becoming an attractive alternative for many people.At the same time, the urban environment is dynamically changing to meet the diverse needs of its residents. Both models certainly have something to offer prospective homebuyers. We will then take a closer look at coliving in particular as part of Perspectives Research.

    GET IN TOUCH

    Want to work with us?